![]() The "B" Movie was the movie that was made on a lower budget that the main attraction and would NOT have been able to stand by itself. Well, I would have to say that the term deals with the afore mentioned double featue. This last thing usually means that main characters are played by those who only appear in blockbusters as supporting actors (Dennis Hopper, Michael Madsen).ī) Entering quality standards: Anything cheaper and/or more imaginative (for good or for bad) than the usual blockbuster. He's even got a commentary track on the DVD of DARK CITY, even though he had nothing to do with the production of the movie.Ī) Without entering quality standards: Any movie released without a great advertising campaign filmed for the screen, direct-to-video or direct-to-TV (more likely than filmed to the screen), which uses ideas or plot structures from previous mainstream productions, has low budget and not an stellar cast. Oh, and by the way, FishStik, Roger Ebert has professed his love for sci-fi and anime many times. In fact, I very rarely use genre definitions at all. ![]() So it's a broad definition, but I don't use the term "b-movie" very often. So PEARL HARBOR is not a b-movie because, even though it's bad, it was accepted by quite a number of people. Supposed-to-be blockbusters can be included if they stunk up the theater so much that mainstream America wouldn't accept them as their own. ![]() STAR WARS or THE SIXTH SENSE.Īlso, any movie that is just bad is usually included in this definition. It's only when a sci-fi/horror bent movie becomes mega-successful that it ceases to be a b-movie, ie. Anything with sci-fi or horror elements is usually included in this definition. I see it as anything that isn't aimed at mainstream Western audiences is a "b-movie". HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE A B-MOVIE? everyone please read this
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |